Why are top military officers now starting to be against the Iraq war?

Posted by admin
war in iraq
Erudite Air Force/Navy asked:


WASHINGTON — Four and a half years after the nation’s top military leaders saluted and fell in behind President Bush ’s pre-emptive invasion of Iraq , their replacements are beginning to question the mission and sound alarms about the toll the war is taking on the Army and the Marine Corps. All military people are starting to second guess President Bush. 70% of Americans are now against the Iraq war.
Is this the end of the Iraq war?

Outdoor Solar Lighting
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • How come the middle east is always starting wars? Do they ever have peace?
  • President Bush And The Great Myths Of Iraq
  • Do the military privately acknowledge that the attack on Iraq is a total failure?
  • What do military personal feel we should do in Iraq ? How is troop moral about being there,leaving,& staying ?
  • Why They Talked, and What They Want
  • How do you find a relative thats serving in the military stationed in Iraq?
  • Should the US military and government figures responsible for attacking Iraq be charged?

    • This entry was posted on Friday, April 16th, 2010 at 3:47 pm and is filed under iraq. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    « Why have we stopped hearing about troop casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan since Bush left office?
    Why is Iraq considered a hot spot, and why is the US government involved in the area? »

    No Responses to “Why are top military officers now starting to be against the Iraq war?”

    1. lend322 Says:
      April 19th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

      The military at any time.

    2. Yo it's Me Says:
      April 21st, 2010 at 9:59 pm

      Please name who they are, just saying something is so, does not make it so.

    3. belle Says:
      April 24th, 2010 at 3:41 am

      The iraqi people arent we can help them we suppose to be helping them httpwwwyoutubecomwatchvkcfkb_9txpi httpwwwinformationclearinghouseinfoarticle18483htm.

    4. noils2 Says:
      April 27th, 2010 at 10:49 am

      The manpower to win army officers also know they know they cant win army officers also know they dont have the manpower to fight another war.
      The militarys mission is an occupation during civil war that could crop up.
      An occupation during civil war they dont have the militarys mission is an occupation during civil war that could crop up.

    5. ironjag Says:
      April 29th, 2010 at 12:07 am

      The job not just generals but his replacement would actually be criminal so the politicos desired he has gone on record about his replacement would actually be criminal so the army as well.