What’s the difference between Iraq and Darfur?
I’ve heard (for a few years now) that we should be going to Darfur to intervene and stop the genocide. Should I mention that its not the so-called warhawk neocons that keep mentioning this to me, it seems like its mostly the anit-Iraq war liberals that want this. What I want to know is why we should go there, when we’re already in a war that ended genocide, and the same people that cry about how bad Iraq is are the same people that want to intervene with Darfur?
Also, the two biggest reasons I’ve heard about why we should send troops to Darfur is
1) Stop the genocide (Like Saddam pulled against the Kurds?)
2) China’s getting their oil (that sounds familiar)
So what’s the difference between an unpopular actual war and this popular proposal of war? To me this seems like hypocrisy, but there HAS to be a good explanation somewhere… please tell me!
Brass Plumbing Fittings












March 31st, 2010 at 7:13 pm
The cease fire agreement they signed.
April 3rd, 2010 at 5:11 am
The very same question for long time now but nobody wants to admit about the very same question for long time now but all get is the genocide story but all get is the very same question for long time.