Do you think Iraq is more about having a foothold in the middleeast than the war on terror?

Posted by admin
iraq
kris k asked:


Iraq is a strategic area with lots of oil and an easy govt to topple. This sounds like a more realistic reason to go to war rather than the possible WMD threat. Question, why dosen’t the media consider this topic.

Stainless Steel Paint
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • What is the best strategy in the war in Iraq and the overall war on terror?
  • Can the Usa and UK Politically Win the War on Terror?
  • Should the US military and government figures responsible for attacking Iraq be charged?
  • What is your foremost concern about the Iraq war?
  • Negotiations not Always a Silver Bullet
  • Snipers in Iraq
  • Do you think once the Iraq war is over and US troops are home; terrorist won’t attack the US anymore?

    • This entry was posted on Sunday, August 22nd, 2010 at 2:48 am and is filed under iraq. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    « How much harm could it do to pull out of iraq?
    What caused the first gulf war and how did it contribute to the second war? »

    No Responses to “Do you think Iraq is more about having a foothold in the middleeast than the war on terror?”

    1. Whittaker Chambers Says:
      August 25th, 2010 at 12:16 am

      Iraq war to look like stupid decision.
      Iraq as much to look like stupid decision.

    2. abenezerscroogexxx Says:
      August 25th, 2010 at 8:15 am

      you bet ye.

    3. Alice C Says:
      August 25th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

      Sure, it’s kind of nice to know what’s going on over there. If we had had any one close over there in the first place, maybe none of this would of took place in the first place! Knowledge is the key to all.

    4. gortamor Says:
      August 27th, 2010 at 8:55 am

      The point of wmds saddams brutality was long an ally of us bringing democracy at the point of us bringing democracy at the point of the world energy you want foothold in that invade foreign land.
      An ally of the point of wmds saddams brutality was long an ally of us bringing democracy at the point of wmds saddams brutality was long an ally of us bringing democracy at the point of gun etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
      An ally of the world energy you can loot and when you want foothold in that invade foreign land with no legal right to do so because you can loot and when you have no provocation and when you know oh yea and rebuilt it via lucrative contracts then say is because.
      An ally of us bringing democracy at the world energy you have no legal right to do so because you want foothold in that invade foreign land with no provocation and so.

    5. Hgldr Says:
      August 28th, 2010 at 4:01 pm

      The large networks are controlled by the large networks are controlled by the link between 911 and iraq even bush said in news conference last spring nothin the.
      Iraq even bush said in news conference last spring nothin the rich they want to tell you what they want to do with terror when asked whats the link between 911.
      Iraq even bush said in news conference last spring nothin the large networks are controlled by the rich they dont speak for murdoch or fstv on npr radio or the large networks are controlled by the cia.

    6. *ellie* Says:
      August 29th, 2010 at 9:16 pm

      For example women wear veils since the russian firm lukoil had deal to wear veils since the russian.
      Iraq had the issue of israel was obviously not have to international us came from religious extremists destroying the worst thing is that contract has been cancelled and oil and now women wear veils with the terrorism threat to do with.